Collection agencies can be very useful in some circumstances and the credit industry does, on the whole, recognise that fact. However, there is no doubt that debt collection agencies have a long-standing and difficult reputation to live down - and recent adverse publicity relating to consumer collections hasn't helped at all, despite the fact that quite a lot of consumer debt is taken care of 'in-house' by, for example, banking organisations, rather than regular (and more strictly regulated!)collection agencies.
Quite apart from that, of course, some credit managers prefer to use a firm of Solicitors rather than a debt collection agency.
One theory being punted about at the moment is that collection agency personnel are better trained to deal with debt collection than Solicitors are - that they have more appropriate telephone and negotiating skills, are better equipped to trace defaulters, and can arrange 'doorstep collection'. I personally don't agree that that is the case. Solicitors specialising in debt collection have all the appropriate skills and all the appropriate computer software to do an excellent job - and they don't have a 'difficult reputation' to overcome. Furthermore, collections sent to agencies very often end up with Solicitors in any event - which often means that, effectively, the client pays more than he might have done had he gone to a Solicitor in the first instance.
No comments:
Post a Comment